2013年3月10日 星期日

艺术的革命:埃及的非暴力的勇士们

April 14, 2011 12:00 AMBy Marwa AwadHugo Dixon

Read more: http://www.dailystar.com.lb/Apr/14/The-art-of-revolution-Egypts-nonviolent-warriors.ashx#ixzz2N97QpFAH
(The Daily Star :: Lebanon News :: http://www.dailystar.com.lb) 

A+A-

CAIRO: In early 2005, Cairo-based computer engineer Saad Bahaar was trawling the Internet when he came across a trio of Egyptian expatriates who advocated the use of nonviolent techniques to overthrow strongman Hosni Mubarak.Bahaar, then 32 and interested in politics and how Egypt might change, was intrigued by the idea. He contacted the group, lighting one of the fuses that would end in freedom in Tahrir Square six years later.The three men he approached – Hisham Morsy, a physician, Wael Adel, a civil engineer by training, and Adel’s cousin Ahmad, a chemist – had all left Egypt for jobs in London. Inspired by the way Serbian group Otpor had brought down Slobodan Milosevic through nonviolent protests in 2000, the trio studied previous struggles. One of their favorite thinkers was Gene Sharp, a Boston-based academic who was heavily influenced by Mahatma Gandhi. The group had set up a Web page in 2004 to propagate civil disobedience ideas in Arabic.
At first, the three young Egyptians’ activities were purely theoretical. But in November 2005, Wael Adel came to Cairo to give a three-day training session on civil disobedience. In the audience were about 30 members of Kefaya, an anti-Mubarak protest group whose name means “enough” in Arabic.
Kefaya had gained prominence during the September 2005 presidential election which Mubarak won by a landslide. During these protests, they had been attacked by thugs and some women members had been stripped naked. Bahaar joined Adel on the course and his career as an underground trainer in nonviolent activism was born.
Adel taught activists how to function within a decentralized network. Doing so would make it harder for the security services to snuff them out by arresting leaders. They were also instructed on how to maintain a disciplined nonviolent approach in the face of police brutality, and how to win over bystanders.
“The third party, the bystander sitting on the fence, will join when he realizes that security forces’ use of violence is unwarranted,” Bahaar said in one of a series of interviews with Reuters. “Security will harass you to provoke an angry violent response to justify a repressive crackdown in the name of law and order. But you must avoid this trap.”
The process took time. As Wael Adel put it during an interview in a rundown Cairo cafe in March, there was a process of “trial and error” before Egypt’s nonviolent warriors were strong enough to begin to take on a dictator.
Kefaya, for example, did run some more campaigns – including one for judicial independence in 2006. But it failed to stir mass protests or expand beyond the middle class elite. There was also internal disagreement between its younger activists and older politicians. By 2007, it had lost its momentum and many had quit.
In the meantime, the trio of thinkers had morphed into an organization called the Academy of Change – based in London and ultimately moving to Qatar. The Academy became a window for Egypt’s activists into civil disobedience movements outside the Arab world. To disseminate the new methods of resistance, it wrote books about nonviolent activism with a focus on the Arab world: “Civil Disobedience,” “Nonviolent War the 3rd Choice” and “AOC MindQuake” that were published in 2007.
A year later the Academy published “Shields to Protect Against Fear,” a manual on techniques to protect one’s body against attacks by security services during a protest. “The idea of nonviolent protest is not martyrdom,” Adel said. “We knew to get ordinary Egyptians, and Arabs, to face their governments and security, they have to have tools to protect themselves. This boosts the morale and enthusiasm to go to the street.”
The ideas espoused by the Academy spread through Egypt. The calls for change reached industrial areas where large groups of workers have long suffered low wages and bad work conditions. Mounting economic hardship mobilized workers in the Nile Delta city of Mahalla al-Kobra, home to the country’s biggest textile factory. The workers had been in contact with Kefaya activists and other independent labor activists. The groundwork for a sustained mass mobilization was being prepared.
The first real victory sprung from Mahalla in December 2006 when over 20,000 textile workers staged a six-day strike over unpaid bonuses. The protesters – peaceful but stubborn – confused police forces accustomed to clashing with disorganized crowds. The government offered concessions to avoid losses from a halt to production.
Then came a setback. In April 2008, workers in Mahalla went out on strike again, over rising prices. An online call by Kefaya’s former activists to support the Mahalla strike on fizzled out. Meanwhile, in Mahalla, the protest turned violent. Activists claim plain-clothes police destroyed public and police property and then blamed it on the protesters. Bloody clashes between police and Mahalla citizens lasted three days. Police fired live rounds and tear gas, while enraged crowds threw rocks. At least three people were killed, hundreds were wounded and scores arrested.
More discipline was needed. Bahaar began to widen his efforts, traveling to disparate locations farther away from the capital to extend grassroots awareness of peaceful civil disobedience.
Meanwhile, ex-Kefaya activists formed the April 6 Facebook group, using the internet to gather supporters. The group adopted the Otpor clenched-fist logo and some members traveled to Serbia for civil disobedience training.
February 2010. Mohammed ElBaradei was back in Cairo. The former head of the International Atomic Energy Association and Nobel peace prize winner had inspired some of Egypt’s younger generation that change was possible. Several of them had created a Facebook page backing ElBaradei as the country’s next president. But how were they to achieve their goal given Mubarak’s repressive regime? They turned to the Academy for help.
The Academy directed them to its online training manuals, which the Facebook activists tried for a while. But despite their internet savvy, many felt that relying entirely on online training was too theoretical. Couldn’t the Academy give them practical training?
Enter Bahaar.
Those who had signed up to the Facebook page were divided into groups of 100. Bahaar trained eight of the groups in different parts of the country using, among other tools, Powerpoint presentations that explained how you maximize the power of a protest movement. Every protester had a family, and around the family was a wider community, Bahaar explained. If a protester was arrested or beaten by the police, his or her family might be radicalized. Similarly, if a policeman engaged in brutality, his family and social network might not be supportive. By maintaining disciplined nonviolent activity, the regime’s power could be progressively weakened.
Why wasn’t Bahaar himself arrested? He says this was partly because he was working underground but also, he thinks, because the security services didn’t judge his nonviolent approach a threat.
Others were not so lucky. Khaled Said, 28, was beaten to death by police in Alexandria, Egypt’s second-largest city, in June 2010. His family said he had posted a video showing police officers sharing the spoils of a drugs bust. Said’s body was barely recognizable and the act of brutality galvanized further protests – in particular, the anti-torture Facebook page “We are Khaled Said,” created by Google executive Wael Ghoneim and underground activist Abdel-Rahman Mansour.
The page played a pivotal role in spreading nonviolent strategies such as “flash mob” silent protests, where groups of people suddenly gather in a public place and do something unusual in unison for a short time before dispersing. Instructions for a nationwide “flash mob” were posted on the page. Participants were told to dress in black and arrive at specific locations in small groups to skirt the ban on large public gatherings. They formed single files along main roads with their backs turned to the street. After a certain hour they marched away.
“The Khaled Said page drew countless willing supporters, many apolitical, because its focus was ending human rights violations and that is an issue that affects all citizens. The page set gradual, easy-to-handle tasks. People felt safe and joined,” said Ahmad Saleh, one of the organizers working with the ElBaradei youth campaign and Khaled Said page.
Like Mahalla’s 2006 strike, the flash mob was a new type of protest unfamiliar to security forces. Its cadres were organized, civil, and well diffused across Egypt –and seemingly leaderless. The police didn’t know how to react. Participants were trained in nonviolent techniques – both online, by the “Khaled Said” page founders, and on the ground, by Bahaar.
In late 2010, the Khaled Said page decided to call for something more ambitious – a nationwide march to demand the dissolution of Parliament, the disbanding of the state security agency and the resignation of the interior minister.
The date chosen for mass action was Jan. 25, Egypt’s national police day. Mansour – who was conscripted into the army on Jan. 17 – posted the call for the nationwide march on Dec. 28. Protesters were urged to march to Cairo’s Tahrir Square and other public spaces across the country. The page was not yet calling for Mubarak to go. It was Tunisia’s popular uprising, which reached its climax on Jan. 14 with the ousting of President Zein al-Abedine Ben Ali, which turned Egypt’s protests into an uprising.
The protest drew people of all ages and backgrounds. By 8 p.m. a unified, single chant inspired by Tunisia rang around Tahrir (Arabic for “freedom”) Square: “The people demand the fall of the regime.” By then, many understood at least a few of the tactics of nonviolent disobedience. “You don’t need to train every single protester, only a small group of activists well connected with people in their local areas. Ideas spread like a virus,” says Bahaar.
Protesters conversed with riot police sent to cordon off the square. The aim was simple: win over those in uniform. Women gave out food and biscuits to hungry conscripts and officers.
Young people quickly regrouped after being dispersed. Some climbed security personnel carriers to drag down officers firing tear gas and water cannons, raising the crowd’s resolve to push security back and gain more ground. A pattern of whistling and rhythmic banging of stones on metal fences in Tahrir spontaneously developed when they needed to rally reinforcements to hold the fort. Protesters would also whistle to signal their success in forcing security to pull back.
Encouraged by the mass protests, the Khaled Said page posted a second online call for Friday, Jan. 28, naming the event a “revolution” to overthrow the regime.
April 6 activists and youth from the Muslim Brotherhood formed the crucial front lines of protesters who broke security cordons and later faced attacks from pro-Mubarak loyalists. The youth of the Muslim Brotherhood, accustomed to working within disciplined ranks, played a critical role in organizing activists into security teams to guard Tahrir Square’s multiple entrances. They searched those who came into the square for weapons or fluids that could be turned into Molotov cocktails. They wanted neither infiltrators nor supporters to turn to violence.
To help demonstrators hold true to nonviolent resistance, the Academy posted online an eight-minute film covering similar ground to its 2008 manual. This explained how people could protect their chests and backs with makeshift shields made of plastic and thick cardboard, and how to mitigate the effect of tear gas by covering their faces with handkerchiefs doused in vinegar, lemons or onions.
For the most part, people were having fun. They also took pride in their ownership of the square. Music was put on. Volunteers and protesters swept it, collected garbage and built outhouses.
“Nonviolent action is not just about nonviolence, but also about joy and happiness,” Adel said. “The festive atmosphere was a key element to drawing the high numbers that Egypt had rarely seen. People felt safe so they came out … ”
The protests were not entirely peaceful. In particular, scuffles broke out after a group of thugs thought to have been organized by Mubarak’s henchmen charged through the square on horses and camels on Feb. 2, beating and whipping protesters in what came to be known as the “Battle of the Camel.” Many demonstrators fought back, throwing stones at Mubarak loyalists to keep them from entering the square. But there was no wholesale riot and discipline returned.
“The key to a successful nonviolent revolt is its ability to constantly reinvent and correct itself,” Adel says. “If violence or conflict breaks out, quickly resolve it while finding ways to avoid it.” Trained cadres shouted “peaceful, peaceful!” to restrain their hotter-headed colleagues. Soon after, the army said it would not fire on unarmed civilians.
Nine days later Mubarak was gone.
 
A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Daily Star on April 14, 2011, on page 9.

Read more: http://www.dailystar.com.lb/Apr/14/The-art-of-revolution-Egypts-nonviolent-warriors.ashx#ixzz2N97LRzH3
(The Daily Star :: Lebanon News :: http://www.dailystar.com.lb) 

沒有留言:

張貼留言